So let's talk for a few minutes about what's going to happen if the feminists get their way and Clancy is acquitted of murdering her three children due to "hormones."
If this happens, it will open a Pandora's Box of bad shit that I know the feminists haven't even considered yet. 99% of the feminists I've encountered in one way or another are very short-sighted, never stopping to look past the initial victory to the long-term effects. Believe me, if there's a case where they seriously need to do this, the Clancy case is it. Here's what I think is going to happen if they get their way and that Pandora's Box is opened should Clancy be acquitted.
1. No more female police officers. If a woman can't be held accountable for her actions due to hormones and you never know when her hormones are going to go off-road, there's no way you can trust them with a firearm. They would have the power to shoot anyone for anything at anytime and simply claim "my hormones made me do it!"
2. No more females in the military. For the same reasons listed above, only female soldiers have access to far deadlier weaponry than the average police officer.
3. No more female judges. If a woman's judgement is affected by her hormones and she can't be held accountable, then there's no way anyone could ever trust her judgement to be correct 100% of the time. So erring on the side of caution, there's no way a female could ever be a judge.
4. No more female elected officials. And I mean at EVERY LEVEL of government. Again, if a woman's judgement is affected by her hormones and she can't be held responsible, then she can't serve in an elected leadership position at any level of government. Can you imagine - and I know this is way out there, but think about what we're talking about - if we had a female President and she hit the red button and launched a nuclear attack because her hormones were acting up?
5. No more parental custody of children. If you can't trust a woman's judgement because of her hormones, then how can you trust her to not murder her own children? This means that in all divorce cases where children are involved, full custody would go to the father and there would be NO unsupervised visitation rights.
6. Immediate loss of custody of children. As soon as woman's hormones start acting up, the state needs to either lock the woman up until it's over or take her children from her because she can't be trusted.
I could go on, but I think you get the idea.
If Clancy gets off because of this bullshit 'my hormones made me do it' defense, that's going to do two things: it's going to completely nullify the 19th Amendment, and it's going to set women's rights back at least 150 years. The bottom line is this: If you can't trust a woman due to her hormones, then you can't trust a woman with ANYTHING.
This is what's waiting for the women in this country if Clancy gets away with murder due to her bullshit defense. And when it happens, the feminists are going to blame it on the men like they always do.
And don't even get me started on that asshole lawyer who dreamed up this bullshit defense. I'll save that for another post in the very near future.
In the mean time, let's all pray for three things: that the state of Massachusetts tries her again, that this time she's convicted, and most of all for the three little children she murdered.



