Pandora's Box

 

So let's talk for a few minutes about what's going to happen if the feminists get their way and Clancy is acquitted of murdering her three children due to "hormones."  

If this happens, it will open a Pandora's Box of bad shit that I know the feminists haven't even considered yet.  99% of the feminists I've encountered in one way or another are very short-sighted, never stopping to look past the initial victory to the long-term effects.  Believe me, if there's a case where they seriously need to do this, the Clancy case is it.  Here's what I think is going to happen if they get their way and that Pandora's Box is opened should Clancy be acquitted.

1.  No more female police officers.  If a woman can't be held accountable for her actions due to hormones and you never know when her hormones are going to go off-road, there's no way you can trust them with a firearm.  They would have the power to shoot anyone for anything at anytime and simply claim "my hormones made me do it!"

2.  No more females in the military.  For the same reasons listed above, only female soldiers have access to far deadlier weaponry than the average police officer.

3.  No more female judges.  If a woman's judgement is affected by her hormones and she can't be held accountable, then there's no way anyone could ever trust her judgement to be correct 100% of the time.  So erring on the side of caution, there's no way a female could ever be a judge.

4.  No more female elected officials.  And I mean at EVERY LEVEL of government.  Again, if a woman's judgement is affected by her hormones and she can't be held responsible, then she can't serve in an elected leadership position at any level of government.  Can you imagine - and I know this is way out there, but think about what we're talking about - if we had a female President and she hit the red button and launched a nuclear attack because her hormones were acting up?

5.  No more parental custody of children.  If you can't trust a woman's judgement because of her hormones, then how can you trust her to not murder her own children?  This means that in all divorce cases where children are involved, full custody would go to the father and there would be NO unsupervised visitation rights.

6.  Immediate loss of custody of children.  As soon as woman's hormones start acting up, the state needs to either lock the woman up until it's over or take her children from her because she can't be trusted.

I could go on, but I think you get the idea.

If Clancy gets off because of this bullshit 'my hormones made me do it' defense, that's going to do two things:  it's going to completely nullify the 19th Amendment, and it's going to set women's rights back at least 150 years.  The bottom line is this:  If you can't trust a woman due to her hormones, then you can't trust a woman with ANYTHING.

This is what's waiting for the women in this country if Clancy gets away with murder due to her bullshit defense.  And when it happens, the feminists are going to blame it on the men like they always do.

And don't even get me started on that asshole lawyer who dreamed up this bullshit defense.  I'll save that for another post in the very near future.

In the mean time, let's all pray for three things:  that the state of Massachusetts tries her again, that this time she's convicted, and most of all for the three little children she murdered.

Deo Vindice

IHC

 

  

Hormones, My Ass

 

Let me make one thing clear right off the bat, because I'm sure there are some folk out there that will hit this one point first off when they disagree with what I'm about to say.

I'm not a woman, therefore I have no idea just how powerful a woman's hormones can be.  But I have, however, lived with a woman through two pregnancies and then menopause, so yeah, I get it.  I've seen what hormones can do to a woman first hand, so I get it about as much as any man can.  But just to be on the safe side and to get a woman's opinion, I talked about the Lindsay Clancy case with my wife, and she gave me some first-hand insight on just how powerful a woman's hormones can be.

And I believe her, I really do.  But there's still no reason in my mind that you can blame this woman's heinous act on hormones.  What this bitch did was premeditated murder, plain and simple, and here's why.

First and foremost, she sent her husband out to run some bullshit errand to give her the opportunity to kill her kids.  If that isn't the textbook definition of 'premeditation,' I don't know what is. 

Second, death by strangulation is not the quick event as is depicted on TV and in the movies.  While there is no set standard of time that it takes to kill someone by strangulation, on average it takes three to four minutes for death to occur.  The victim can lose consciousness in less than a minute if the flow of blood to the brain is shut off, but death takes much longer than that.  And if the victim doesn't lose consciousness, the pain and suffering they must endure for that three to four minutes is indescribable.

That's what she put all three of her kids through, by the way. 

Third, she called her husband while he was out and told him not to hurry home.

Fourth, immediately after she killed her kids she attempted suicide by jumping out of a second story window of her home.  If that isn't guilt talking I don't know what is.  (She broke her back in the fall and is paralyzed from the chest down; that's why she's in a wheelchair.) 

Now, I don't give a rat's ass what kind of reasoning you can come up with, you are NOT - repeat, NOT - going to convince me that this woman killed her three kids in this brutal, horrific way while caught up in a rush of hormones.  EVER.  No, this was a planned, calculated act, nothing short of premeditated murder, and for the life of me I don't understand how ANY woman could possibly say it wasn't her fault because of 'hormones.'

In 1994 Susan Smith strapped her two kids into their child safety seats in her car and then drove the car into a lake, letting them drown.  When she came to trial the sidewalk leading up to the courthouse was lined with woman screaming "Murderer!" and "Baby killer!" and demanding the death penalty.  But when Clancy came to court, the sidewalks were lined with women supporting her and screaming for her release.

Is this how far our society has sunk?  I'm afraid to say that yes, it is - at least on the liberal side of the population, that is.  How ANY mother can support what Clancy did is beyond the scope of my comprehension.

It is my fervent hope that the state retries her on the murder charges, and this time I hope the attorney for the prosecution does a much better job of picking the jurors.  I also hope that this time around she's convicted and sent to prison - not to a mental facility, but PRISON. 

Do I think she was temporarily insane?  NO, I don't, because of the obvious planning that she had to accomplish in order to carry out her crimes.  She's as crazy as Susan Smith was, which is not crazy at all, and she deserves to spend the rest of her life in prison for what she did to those three poor children.

And when she dies, I hope she rots in hell.

Deo Vindice

IHC